PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XQQ.TO vs. MGK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XQQ.TO vs. MGK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XQQ.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XQQ.TO returned 19.70%/yr vs 20.10%/yr for MGK. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XQQ.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGK.

Performance

XQQ.TO vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XQQ.TO is traded in CAD, while MGK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MGK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQQ.TO achieves a 19.81% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 11.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XQQ.TO having a 19.70% annualized return and MGK not far ahead at 20.10%.

XQQ.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
10.58%
YTD
19.81%
6M
18.06%
1Y
38.49%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
19.70%

MGK

1D
-0.73%
1M
9.40%
YTD
11.41%
6M
9.03%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
28.24%
5Y*
19.57%
10Y*
20.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQQ.TO vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		19.81%18.38%24.23%52.23%-33.67%22.29%45.23%37.48%-2.33%31.83%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF		11.41%15.13%44.36%48.33%-28.85%27.42%38.63%30.63%5.33%21.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XQQ.TO and MGK is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2011

0.79

The correlation between XQQ.TO and MGK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

XQQ.TO vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XQQ.TO
MGK

Technology

53.7%
56.1%

Communication Services

15.8%
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
0.4%

Healthcare

4.2%
4.5%

Industrials

3.1%
1.1%

Utilities

1.4%
1.2%

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.7%

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
4.5%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.3%

Technology

XQQ.TO
53.7%
MGK
56.1%

Communication Services

XQQ.TO
15.8%
MGK
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XQQ.TO
12.2%
MGK
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

XQQ.TO
7.7%
MGK
0.4%

Healthcare

XQQ.TO
4.2%
MGK
4.5%

Industrials

XQQ.TO
3.1%
MGK
1.1%

Utilities

XQQ.TO
1.4%
MGK
1.2%

Basic Materials

XQQ.TO
1.1%
MGK
0.7%

Energy

XQQ.TO
0.6%
MGK

-

Financial Services

XQQ.TO
0.2%
MGK
4.5%

Real Estate

XQQ.TO
0.1%
MGK
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF

Often compared with XQQ.TO:
XQQ.TO vs. QQC.TOXQQ.TO vs. VFV.TOXQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. XQQU.TOXQQ.TO vs. QQQXQQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. TEC.TO
Often compared with MGK:
MGK vs. VGTMGK vs. VUGMGK vs. QQQMGK vs. SCHGMGK vs. MAGSMGK vs. MGCMGK vs. MGV

Return for Risk

XQQ.TO vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XQQ.TO
XQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQQ.TO vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XQQ.TOMGKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.45
2.00

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.20
2.69

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

1.86

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.31

5.56

+5.75

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XQQ.TO vs. MGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQQ.TO and MGK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XQQ.TOMGKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.00

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.94

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.99

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.08

-0.22

Drawdowns

XQQ.TO vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.55%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -32.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQ.TO and MGK.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XQQ.TOMGKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.55%

-32.63%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-17.14%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-23.85%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.55%

-32.63%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.55%

-32.63%

-5.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.73%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-4.63%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

5.71%

-2.30%

Volatility

XQQ.TO vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 3.89%. This indicates that XQQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XQQ.TOMGKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

3.89%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.00%

12.03%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.82%

15.94%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.52%

21.03%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

20.39%

+1.95%

XQQ.TO vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

XQQ.TO vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

XQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than MGK's 0.32% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF		0.32%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.21%0.25%0.32%0.31%0.43%0.17%0.26%0.46%0.52%0.53%0.76%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

XQQ.TO and MGK have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XQQ.TO.

XQQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. XQQ.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XQQ.TO and 0.05% for MGK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQQ.TO and MGK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer