XPPT.L vs. IAUP.L
XPPT.L (Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities) and IAUP.L (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XPPT.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum, while IAUP.L is a Gold fund tracking the S&P Commodity Producers Gold Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XPPT.L returned 9.70%/yr vs 18.73%/yr for IAUP.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XPPT.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IAUP.L.
Performance
XPPT.L vs. IAUP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPPT.L achieves a -5.42% return, which is significantly lower than IAUP.L's 1.67% return.
XPPT.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- -5.42%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 65.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- —
IAUP.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- 1Y
- 63.48%
- 3Y*
- 42.10%
- 5Y*
- 18.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
XPPT.L vs. IAUP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPPT.L Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities | -5.42% | 118.57% | -9.77% | -5.84% | 9.77% | -10.80% | 36.71% |
IAUP.L iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.67% | 153.95% | 11.53% | 9.39% | -11.06% | -10.31% | 19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPPT.L and IAUP.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XPPT.L and IAUP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPPT.L vs. IAUP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XPPT.L
IAUP.L
XPPT.L vs. IAUP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPPT.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 2.21 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 5.66 | -1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPPT.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.46 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.53 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.09 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
XPPT.L vs. IAUP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPPT.L drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, smaller than the maximum IAUP.L drawdown of -79.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.L and IAUP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPPT.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.92% | -79.95% | +43.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.12% | -28.57% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.12% | -28.57% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -44.90% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.35% | -24.01% | -9.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.04% | -49.54% | +29.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.94% | 11.20% | +5.74% |
Volatility
XPPT.L vs. IAUP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) is 11.59%, while iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L) has a volatility of 14.96%. This indicates that XPPT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAUP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPPT.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.59% | 14.96% | -3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.18% | 35.03% | +8.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.62% | 43.36% | +5.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.46% | 35.32% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.85% | 34.55% | -1.70% |
XPPT.L vs. IAUP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPPT.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUP.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPPT.L vs. IAUP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XPPT.L nor IAUP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XPPT.L and IAUP.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XPPT.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XPPT.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IAUP.L.
XPPT.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while IAUP.L is Gold. XPPT.L tracks Platinum, while IAUP.L tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for XPPT.L and 0.55% for IAUP.L.
Find the right allocation for XPPT.L and IAUP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer