XPP vs. SOXL
XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - XPP tracks the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%) while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XPP returned -6.70%/yr vs 68.12%/yr for SOXL. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XPP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
XPP vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a -34.24% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 501.02% return. Over the past 10 years, XPP has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of -6.70%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 68.12% annualized return.
XPP
- 1D
- -4.68%
- 1M
- -21.13%
- YTD
- -34.24%
- 6M
- -35.23%
- 1Y
- -31.54%
- 3Y*
- 0.47%
- 5Y*
- -23.89%
- 10Y*
- -6.70%
SOXL
- 1D
- 10.04%
- 1M
- 11.88%
- YTD
- 501.02%
- 6M
- 471.39%
- 1Y
- 928.01%
- 3Y*
- 126.70%
- 5Y*
- 44.97%
- 10Y*
- 68.12%
XPP vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | -34.24% | 45.84% | 38.18% | -34.77% | -50.06% | -40.45% | 7.07% | 24.88% | -31.36% | 80.21% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 501.02% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPP and SOXL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | 0.51 |
The correlation between XPP and SOXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XPP vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XPP
SOXL
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XPP
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
XPP
-
SOXL
-
Communication Services
XPP
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
XPP
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
XPP
-
SOXL
-
Energy
XPP
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
XPP
-
SOXL
-
Industrials
XPP
-
SOXL
-
Real Estate
XPP
-
SOXL
-
Technology
XPP
-
SOXL
Utilities
XPP
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPP vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
XPP
SOXL
XPP vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XPP | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.57 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 21.57 | -22.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.73 | 68.63 | -70.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XPP vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPP | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.90% | -90.46% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.65% | -43.47% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.95% | -87.88% | +34.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.24% | -90.46% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.90% | -90.46% | +0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.59% | -16.01% | -66.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.92% | -34.94% | -12.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.20% | 13.64% | +4.56% |
Volatility
XPP vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) is 13.07%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 66.73%. This indicates that XPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPP | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.07% | 66.73% | -53.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.87% | 99.97% | -70.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.37% | 116.70% | -77.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.86% | 110.41% | -47.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.80% | 100.63% | -45.83% |
XPP vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPP vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while SOXL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | 3.18% | 2.32% | 2.96% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.81% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPP and SOXL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (66.73%) compared to XPP (13.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPP dropped -89.90% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 68.12% vs -6.70% for XPP. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XPP has been the lower-risk option at 13.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 68.12% return vs -6.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XPP.
XPP has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.00% for SOXL.
XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XPP and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.03 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPP and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer