XPO vs. CLMB
XPO (XPO Logistics, Inc.) and CLMB (Climb Global Solutions) are both stocks. XPO operates in Integrated Freight & Logistics (Industrials), while CLMB operates in Electronics & Computer Distribution (Technology). Over the past 10 years, XPO returned 36.48%/yr vs 20.89%/yr for CLMB. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XPO vs. CLMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPO achieves a 65.30% return, which is significantly higher than CLMB's -7.50% return. Over the past 10 years, XPO has outperformed CLMB with an annualized return of 36.48%, while CLMB has yielded a comparatively lower 20.89% annualized return.
XPO
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 65.30%
- 6M
- 59.53%
- 1Y
- 89.63%
- 3Y*
- 66.70%
- 5Y*
- 35.18%
- 10Y*
- 36.48%
CLMB
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 18.14%
- YTD
- -7.50%
- 6M
- -14.10%
- 1Y
- -9.53%
- 3Y*
- 27.04%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- 20.89%
XPO vs. CLMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPO XPO Logistics, Inc. | 65.30% | 3.63% | 49.73% | 163.11% | -27.64% | 11.60% | 49.56% | 39.73% | -37.72% | 112.21% |
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | -7.50% | -18.40% | 133.60% | 76.59% | -8.29% | 88.47% | 22.14% | 70.90% | -37.08% | -7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPO and CLMB is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2003 | 0.13 |
The correlation between XPO and CLMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
XPO:
$26.73B
CLMB:
$432.99M
XPO:
$2.92
CLMB:
$1.16
XPO:
76.98
CLMB:
20.57
XPO:
2.89
CLMB:
0.87
XPO:
3.23
CLMB:
0.62
XPO:
14.44
CLMB:
3.66
XPO:
$8.30B
CLMB:
$696.85M
XPO:
$772.00M
CLMB:
$108.37M
XPO:
$1.20B
CLMB:
$35.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPO vs. CLMB — Risk / Return Rank
XPO
CLMB
XPO vs. CLMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) and Climb Global Solutions (CLMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPO | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.01 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.77 | -0.18 | +5.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.70 | -0.37 | +14.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPO | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | -0.18 | +2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.64 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.51 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.22 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
XPO vs. CLMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPO drawdown since its inception was -82.85%, smaller than the maximum CLMB drawdown of -89.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPO and CLMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPO | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.85% | -89.12% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.63% | -53.40% | +37.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.19% | -53.40% | +11.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.17% | -53.40% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.48% | -53.40% | -11.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -33.59% | +31.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.28% | -32.23% | +1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.56% | 25.81% | -19.25% |
Volatility
XPO vs. CLMB - Volatility Comparison
XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) and Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) have volatilities of 9.87% and 10.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPO | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.87% | 10.32% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.81% | 40.72% | -8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.47% | 52.14% | -8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.90% | 45.76% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.80% | 40.89% | +6.91% |
Dividends
XPO vs. CLMB - Dividend Comparison
XPO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | 0.36% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 1.24% | 2.16% | 1.94% | 3.56% | 4.20% | 6.80% | 4.07% | 3.64% | 3.71% |
XPO XPO Logistics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
XPO vs. CLMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between XPO Logistics, Inc. and Climb Global Solutions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
XPO vs. CLMB - Profitability Comparison
XPO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CLMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a gross profit of 26.50M and revenue of 182.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.5%.
XPO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 174.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.
CLMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported an operating income of 3.88M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
XPO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 101.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
CLMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a net income of 3.33M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
XPO and CLMB have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLMB has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to XPO (9.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPO dropped -82.85% vs CLMB's -89.12%.
XPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPO and CLMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer