PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPAY vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPAY vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPAY achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 20.15% return.


XPAY

1D
1.33%
1M
1.63%
6M
9.13%
YTD
11.32%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.18%

XOMO

1D
-0.09%
1M
10.85%
6M
7.87%
YTD
20.15%
1Y
29.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$559.24K$694.66K$715.05K
$1.77M$2.52M$3.75M

XPAY vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XPAY and XOMO is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024

-0.02

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between XPAY and XOMO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPAY vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XPAY vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XPAYXOMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.26

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

1.74

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.17

4.35

+5.82

XPAY vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPAY and XOMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPAY vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, roughly equal to the maximum XOMO drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and XOMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPAYXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-18.90%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

-17.25%

+7.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-7.65%

+7.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-7.50%

+5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

6.89%

-4.70%

Volatility

XPAY vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) is 3.67%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that XPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPAYXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

6.21%

-2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

17.24%

-7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

20.67%

-8.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

19.19%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.56%

19.19%

-2.63%

XPAY vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPAY vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.78%, less than XOMO's 37.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
37.07%31.64%26.94%5.13%
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
20.78%21.21%3.40%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPAY and XOMO have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOMO has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to XPAY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPAY dropped -18.20% vs XOMO's -18.90%.

On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 29.81% vs 22.25% for XPAY. On fees, XPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XPAY has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 29.81% return vs 22.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 37.07%, compared with 20.78% for XPAY.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XPAY and 1.01% for XOMO.

XPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPAY and XOMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer