XP vs. ARLP
XP (XP Inc.) and ARLP (Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.) are both stocks. XP operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while ARLP operates in Thermal Coal (Energy). Over the past 5 years, XP returned -15.38%/yr vs 46.39%/yr for ARLP. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XP vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XP achieves a -4.46% return, which is significantly lower than ARLP's 17.49% return.
XP
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -17.25%
- YTD
- -4.46%
- 6M
- -20.42%
- 1Y
- -19.32%
- 3Y*
- -2.41%
- 5Y*
- -15.38%
- 10Y*
- —
ARLP
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 17.49%
- 6M
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- 11.13%
- 3Y*
- 27.53%
- 5Y*
- 46.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
XP vs. ARLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XP XP Inc. | -4.46% | 39.53% | -52.23% | 79.63% | -46.62% | -27.55% | 2.99% | 11.78% |
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. | 17.49% | -2.45% | 39.91% | 18.83% | 73.34% | 195.75% | -56.80% | 8.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XP and ARLP is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2019 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
XP:
$8.22B
ARLP:
$3.34B
XP:
$9.77
ARLP:
$72.64
XP:
1.60
ARLP:
0.36
XP:
0.14
ARLP:
0.01
XP:
0.44
ARLP:
0.01
XP:
0.34
ARLP:
1.62
XP:
$18.65B
ARLP:
$517.67B
XP:
$12.49B
ARLP:
$353.56M
XP:
$6.31B
ARLP:
$82.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XP vs. ARLP — Risk / Return Rank
XP
ARLP
XP vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XP Inc. (XP) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XP | ARLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.10 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 0.63 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 1.20 | -2.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XP | ARLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 0.49 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 1.38 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | 0.37 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
XP vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XP drawdown since its inception was -79.19%, smaller than the maximum ARLP drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XP and ARLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XP | ARLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.19% | -90.52% | +11.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.03% | -17.63% | -14.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.64% | -20.83% | -35.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.19% | -29.13% | -50.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -85.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.71% | -8.16% | -57.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.97% | -24.34% | -22.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.91% | 9.30% | +5.61% |
Volatility
XP vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison
XP Inc. (XP) has a higher volatility of 14.48% compared to Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) at 6.22%. This indicates that XP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XP | ARLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.48% | 6.22% | +8.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.34% | 15.85% | +21.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.50% | 22.75% | +22.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.64% | 33.83% | +15.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.38% | 50.24% | +7.14% |
Dividends
XP vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison
XP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than ARLP's 9.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. | 9.23% | 11.19% | 10.65% | 13.22% | 7.38% | 3.16% | 8.93% | 19.82% | 11.94% | 9.54% | 8.85% | 19.74% |
XP XP Inc. | 1.15% | 1.10% | 5.49% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
XP vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between XP Inc. and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
XP vs. ARLP - Profitability Comparison
XP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XP Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.04B and revenue of 4.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.8%.
ARLP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 516.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
XP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XP Inc. reported an operating income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.6%.
ARLP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 21.86B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
XP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XP Inc. reported a net income of 1.29B and revenue of 4.62B, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.
ARLP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 9.09B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
XP and ARLP have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XP has higher volatility (14.48%) compared to ARLP (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XP dropped -79.19% vs ARLP's -90.52%.
ARLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XP and ARLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer