XOVR vs. YCS
XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ERShares, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). XOVR is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOVR returned 4.34%/yr vs 23.50%/yr for YCS. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
XOVR vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.78% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- -4.20%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- -1.49%
- 6M
- -3.22%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 31.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
XOVR vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | -1.49% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -5.02% | 1.54% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.78% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -1.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and YCS is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017 | 0.05 |
The correlation between XOVR and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
YCS
XOVR vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOVR | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 3.79 | -3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 11.86 | -10.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -49.56% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | -8.30% | -16.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -23.05% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | -27.32% | -22.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.61% | 0.00% | -8.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -19.88% | +1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.05% | 2.65% | +8.40% |
Volatility
XOVR vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.22%. This indicates that XOVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 2.22% | +8.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 12.19% | +5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.14% | 16.96% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.47% | 21.10% | +5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.00% | 18.96% | +8.04% |
XOVR vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOVR vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
Neither XOVR nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and YCS have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOVR has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.50% vs 4.34% for XOVR. On fees, XOVR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.50% return vs 4.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOVR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
XOVR and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
XOVR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: ERShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer