XOVR vs. XAR
XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ERShares, while XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. XOVR is actively managed, while XAR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOVR returned 3.37%/yr vs 18.01%/yr for XAR. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
XOVR vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 13.50% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -8.38%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- -4.47%
- 1Y
- -0.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.77%
XAR
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 13.50%
- 1Y
- 28.13%
- 3Y*
- 31.54%
- 5Y*
- 18.01%
- 10Y*
- 17.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $65.35M | $59.21M | $61.24M | |
| $32.19M | $37.02M | $109.67M |
XOVR vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | -4.47% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -5.02% | 1.54% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 13.50% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 2.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and XAR is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017 | 0.55 |
The correlation between XOVR and XAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
XOVR vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOVR
XAR
Technology
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XOVR
XAR
Communication Services
XOVR
XAR
-
Healthcare
XOVR
XAR
-
Financial Services
XOVR
XAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
XOVR
XAR
-
Industrials
XOVR
XAR
Energy
XOVR
XAR
-
Basic Materials
XOVR
-
XAR
Consumer Defensive
XOVR
-
XAR
-
Real Estate
XOVR
-
XAR
-
Utilities
XOVR
-
XAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
XAR
XOVR vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOVR | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.18 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 1.64 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 4.26 | -4.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than XAR's maximum drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -46.37% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | -17.22% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -19.73% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | -27.55% | -21.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.38% | -6.47% | -4.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -6.78% | -11.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.53% | 6.63% | +4.90% |
Volatility
XOVR vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is 7.84%, while SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that XOVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.84% | 9.61% | -1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.11% | 23.34% | -4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.67% | 28.95% | -5.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.68% | 23.90% | +2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 24.88% | +2.15% |
XOVR vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOVR vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.30% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and XAR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to XOVR (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs XAR's -46.37%.
On 5-year performance, XAR leads with 18.01% vs 3.37% for XOVR. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XOVR has been the lower-risk option at 7.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XAR has performed better with a 18.01% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.
XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
XOVR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XAR is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: ERShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 0.35% for XAR.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer