XOVR vs. WNTR
XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ERShares, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XOVR returned -4.17% vs 107.38% for WNTR. Their -0.52 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
XOVR vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -7.65% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.75% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -11.43%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -7.65%
- 1Y
- -4.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
WNTR
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 107.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.02M | $3.86M | $3.95M | |
| $31.56M | $37.54M | $108.44M |
XOVR vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | -7.65% | 20.45% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 10.75% | 52.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and WNTR is -0.53, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.52 |
The correlation between XOVR and WNTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.53 to -0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
WNTR
XOVR vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOVR | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.32 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 2.71 | -2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 6.87 | -7.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -42.65% | -13.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | -42.65% | +18.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.33% | -9.64% | -4.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -20.18% | +1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.50% | 16.81% | -5.31% |
Volatility
XOVR vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is 6.75%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that XOVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 14.85% | -8.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.94% | 47.43% | -28.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.40% | 54.68% | -31.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 53.42% | -26.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 53.42% | -26.41% |
XOVR vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOVR vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 107.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 107.02% | 58.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and WNTR have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WNTR has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to XOVR (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs WNTR's -42.65%.
On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 107.38% vs -4.17% for XOVR. On fees, XOVR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XOVR has been the lower-risk option at 6.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 107.38% return vs -4.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOVR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
XOVR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ERShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer