XOVR vs. SGRT
XOVR (ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. XOVR is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
XOVR vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOVR vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF | -0.35% | 4.19% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and SGRT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
SGRT
XOVR vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOVR | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOVR | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 3.81 | -3.41 |
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -17.87% | -38.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | 0.00% | -7.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.41% | -3.11% | -15.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.94% | — | — |
Volatility
XOVR vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.00% | 33.41% | -13.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 33.41% | -7.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 33.41% | -6.54% |
XOVR vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOVR vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOVR ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and SGRT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.
SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer