PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOVR vs. QQQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOVR vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 65.37% return.


XOVR

1D
-1.67%
1M
6.93%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
0.55%
1Y
10.88%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*

QQQA

1D
2.20%
1M
23.31%
YTD
65.37%
6M
67.98%
1Y
88.43%
3Y*
34.58%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOVR vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XOVR
ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF
-0.35%11.83%33.21%51.89%-41.09%4.15%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
65.37%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between XOVR and QQQA is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between XOVR and QQQA has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XOVR vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOVR
QQQA

Technology

34.1%
65.2%

Communication Services

26.7%
13.7%

Healthcare

18.4%
7.8%

Financial Services

8.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
4.2%

Industrials

5.4%

-

Energy

3.1%
9.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XOVR
34.1%
QQQA
65.2%

Communication Services

XOVR
26.7%
QQQA
13.7%

Healthcare

XOVR
18.4%
QQQA
7.8%

Financial Services

XOVR
8.5%
QQQA

-

Consumer Cyclical

XOVR
6.9%
QQQA
4.2%

Industrials

XOVR
5.4%
QQQA

-

Energy

XOVR
3.1%
QQQA
9.1%

Basic Materials

XOVR

-

QQQA

-

Consumer Defensive

XOVR

-

QQQA

-

Real Estate

XOVR

-

QQQA

-

Utilities

XOVR

-

QQQA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOVR vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOVR
XOVR Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XOVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XOVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOVR vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOVRQQQADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.54

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

6.11

-5.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.00

22.85

-21.85

XOVR vs. QQQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the QQQA Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOVR and QQQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOVRQQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

3.41

-2.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.57

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.59

-0.19

Drawdowns

XOVR vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than QQQA's maximum drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and QQQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOVRQQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.28%

-38.44%

-17.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.32%

-14.54%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-30.84%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.35%

-38.44%

-10.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.55%

0.00%

-7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-15.68%

-2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.94%

3.88%

+7.06%

Volatility

XOVR vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is 4.20%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that XOVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOVRQQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

10.17%

-5.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.81%

22.18%

-7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.00%

26.05%

-6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.15%

25.83%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.87%

25.77%

+1.10%

XOVR vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOVR vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison

XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOVR
ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%57.75%6.31%0.08%3.71%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOVR and QQQA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to XOVR (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs QQQA's -38.44%.

On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 14.74% vs 6.16% for XOVR. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, XOVR has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 6.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.

QQQA has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.

XOVR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. XOVR tracks ER30TR Index, while QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: EntrepreneurShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 0.58% for QQQA.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOVR and QQQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer