XOVR vs. PSP
XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) and PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ERShares, while PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index. XOVR is actively managed, while PSP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOVR returned 3.96%/yr vs -0.96%/yr for PSP. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.44%/yr for PSP.
Performance
XOVR vs. PSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly higher than PSP's -17.22% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 6M
- -3.85%
- 1Y
- 5.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- —
PSP
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -17.22%
- 6M
- -17.82%
- 1Y
- -13.81%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.96%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
XOVR vs. PSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | -2.09% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -5.02% | 1.54% |
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -17.22% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and PSP is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between XOVR and PSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XOVR vs. PSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOVR
PSP
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XOVR
PSP
Communication Services
XOVR
PSP
Healthcare
XOVR
PSP
Financial Services
XOVR
PSP
Industrials
XOVR
PSP
Consumer Cyclical
XOVR
PSP
-
Energy
XOVR
PSP
-
Basic Materials
XOVR
-
PSP
Consumer Defensive
XOVR
-
PSP
Real Estate
XOVR
-
PSP
-
Utilities
XOVR
-
PSP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. PSP — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
PSP
XOVR vs. PSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOVR | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.90 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | -0.62 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | -1.32 | +1.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. PSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, smaller than the maximum PSP drawdown of -85.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and PSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -85.40% | +29.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | -22.37% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -22.94% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | -47.16% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.17% | -21.27% | +12.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.33% | -30.65% | +12.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.08% | 10.51% | +0.57% |
Volatility
XOVR vs. PSP - Volatility Comparison
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) at 7.41%. This indicates that XOVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 7.41% | +3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.32% | 16.79% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.10% | 20.32% | +1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.47% | 23.89% | +2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 22.36% | +4.63% |
XOVR vs. PSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PSP's 1.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOVR vs. PSP - Dividend Comparison
XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.58% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and PSP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOVR has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to PSP (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs PSP's -85.40%.
On 5-year performance, XOVR leads with 3.96% vs -0.96% for PSP. On fees, XOVR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PSP has been the lower-risk option at 7.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XOVR has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -0.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOVR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
XOVR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PSP is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: ERShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 1.44% for PSP.
XOVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and PSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer