PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSP vs. VPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSP vs. VPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -9.07% return, which is significantly higher than VPC's -11.53% return.


PSP

1D
-0.43%
1M
4.54%
6M
-9.78%
YTD
-9.07%
1Y
-8.31%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
8.10%
ALL TIME*
2.48%

VPC

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.53%
6M
-11.08%
YTD
-11.53%
1Y
-16.30%
3Y*
-1.29%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.20M$1.24M$2.68M
$87.07K$126.50K$156.13K

PSP vs. VPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PSP
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF
-9.07%6.49%17.42%37.72%-37.37%27.30%12.47%21.85%
VPC
Virtus Private Credit ETF
-11.53%-6.75%10.52%22.20%-11.70%34.18%-9.50%9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PSP and VPC is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019

0.64

The correlation between PSP and VPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSP vs. VPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSP
PSP Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSP Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

VPC
VPC Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
VPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
VPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSP vs. VPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSPVPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.81

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

-0.79

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.81

-1.37

+0.55

PSP vs. VPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSP Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is higher than the VPC Sharpe Ratio of -1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSP and VPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSP vs. VPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than VPC's maximum drawdown of -53.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and VPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSPVPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.40%

-53.45%

-31.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.27%

-21.55%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.94%

-24.86%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.16%

-24.86%

-22.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.51%

-21.64%

+8.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.58%

-7.95%

-22.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.63%

12.51%

-0.88%

Volatility

PSP vs. VPC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) at 3.44%. This indicates that PSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSPVPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

3.44%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.69%

11.09%

+5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.19%

13.74%

+6.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.88%

13.58%

+10.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

20.42%

+1.88%

PSP vs. VPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than VPC's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSP vs. VPC - Dividend Comparison

PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, less than VPC's 16.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSP
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF
5.99%5.87%8.62%3.96%2.88%10.34%4.66%5.87%6.81%10.18%4.12%6.23%
VPC
Virtus Private Credit ETF
16.46%14.33%11.26%11.71%10.74%6.31%10.06%8.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSP and VPC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSP has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to VPC (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs VPC's -53.45%.

On 5-year performance, VPC leads with 0.87% vs 0.04% for PSP. On fees, VPC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, VPC has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VPC has performed better with a 0.87% return vs 0.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VPC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.

VPC has the higher dividend yield at 16.46%, compared with 5.99% for PSP.

PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while VPC is Nontraditional Bonds. PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while VPC tracks Indxx Private Credit Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.75% for VPC.

PSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSP and VPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer