XOUT vs. SPIT
XOUT (GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. XOUT is passively managed, while SPIT is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOUT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
XOUT vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -10.33% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 27.92% return.
XOUT
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- -10.33%
- 6M
- -11.73%
- 1Y
- -0.34%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SPIT
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 27.92%
- 6M
- 26.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOUT vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | -10.33% | 1.13% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 27.92% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOUT and SPIT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOUT vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank
XOUT
SPIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XOUT vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOUT | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOUT vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOUT | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -12.49% | -18.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.97% | -2.09% | -10.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -2.55% | -5.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.55% | — | — |
Volatility
XOUT vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOUT | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 26.64% | -6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 26.64% | -4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 26.64% | -3.42% |
XOUT vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOUT vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.61% | 7.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOUT and SPIT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XOUT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XOUT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for XOUT and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer