XOUT vs. SGRT
XOUT (GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. XOUT is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOUT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
XOUT vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
XOUT
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOUT vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | -3.24% | 8.21% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOUT and SGRT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOUT vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
XOUT
SGRT
XOUT vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOUT | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOUT | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 3.81 | -3.14 |
Drawdowns
XOUT vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOUT | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -17.87% | -13.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | 0.00% | -6.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -3.11% | -5.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | — | — |
Volatility
XOUT vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOUT | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 33.41% | -13.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 33.41% | -11.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 33.41% | -10.18% |
XOUT vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOUT vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOUT and SGRT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XOUT.
SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.
Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for XOUT and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer