XOUT vs. PTIR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

XOUT (GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOUT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XOUT returned 4.84% vs -42.21% for PTIR. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XOUT charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PTIR.

Performance

XOUT vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -3.78% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -56.90% return.

XOUT

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 4.97%
• 6M: -4.10%
• YTD: -3.78%
• 1Y: 4.84%
• 3Y*: 16.43%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: —

PTIR

• 1D: 5.11%
• 1M: -0.35%
• 6M: -57.27%
• YTD: -56.90%
• 1Y: -42.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOUT vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF	-3.78%	18.18%	9.84%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-56.90%	221.36%	425.36%

Correlation

The correlation between XOUT and PTIR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.64

The correlation between XOUT and PTIR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

XOUT vs. PTIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XOUT	PTIR
Technology	35.1%	100.0%
Healthcare	17.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	15.4%	-
Communication Services	12.4%	-
Financial Services	9.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	-
Industrials	3.3%	-
Basic Materials	0.6%	-
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Energy	0.2%	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XOUT vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOUT

XOUT Risk / Return Rank: 12
XOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
XOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
XOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 13
XOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
XOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 12

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 6
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOUT vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XOUT	PTIR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	-0.41	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	-0.02	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.00	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.21	-0.53	+0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.50	-0.93	+1.42

XOUT vs. PTIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOUT Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the PTIR Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOUT and PTIR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XOUT vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum PTIR drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and PTIR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOUT	PTIR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.29%	-79.40%	+48.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.21%	-79.40%	+56.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.61%	-70.30%	+63.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-29.84%	+21.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.77%	45.56%	-35.79%

Volatility

XOUT vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) is 5.59%, while GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a volatility of 32.96%. This indicates that XOUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XOUT	PTIR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	32.96%	-27.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.81%	79.46%	-62.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.20%	103.06%	-82.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.93%	128.33%	-106.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.19%	128.33%	-105.14%

XOUT vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIR's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

XOUT vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison

XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	13.48%	5.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	0.51%	0.28%	0.53%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOUT and PTIR in my portfolio?

XOUT and PTIR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XOUT or PTIR?

PTIR has higher volatility (32.96%) compared to XOUT (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOUT dropped -31.29% vs PTIR's -79.40%.

Which ETF is better, XOUT or PTIR?

On 1-year performance, XOUT leads with 4.84% vs -42.21% for PTIR. On fees, XOUT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XOUT has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XOUT or PTIR?

Over the 1-year period, XOUT has performed better with a 4.84% return vs -42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XOUT or PTIR?

XOUT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PTIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XOUT or PTIR?

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 13.48%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.

What is the main difference between XOUT and PTIR?

XOUT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PTIR is Leveraged Equities. XOUT tracks XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while PTIR tracks Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 1.04% for PTIR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XOUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.