PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOUT vs. IOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOUT vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 12.26% return.


XOUT

1D
-2.27%
1M
9.28%
YTD
-3.24%
6M
-4.85%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*

IOO

1D
-1.33%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.26%
6M
12.43%
1Y
38.24%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
16.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOUT vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XOUT
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF
-3.24%18.18%23.11%42.32%-28.18%26.13%28.71%11.32%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
12.26%27.02%26.54%27.71%-16.34%26.03%18.61%11.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XOUT and IOO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2019

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between XOUT and IOO has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XOUT vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOUT
IOO

Technology

35.1%
46.2%

Healthcare

17.3%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
8.4%

Communication Services

12.4%
11.0%

Financial Services

9.6%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
5.6%

Industrials

3.3%
4.8%

Basic Materials

0.6%
1.7%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.2%

Energy

0.2%
3.6%

Utilities

-

0.5%

Technology

XOUT
35.1%
IOO
46.2%

Healthcare

XOUT
17.3%
IOO
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XOUT
15.4%
IOO
8.4%

Communication Services

XOUT
12.4%
IOO
11.0%

Financial Services

XOUT
9.6%
IOO
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

XOUT
5.7%
IOO
5.6%

Industrials

XOUT
3.3%
IOO
4.8%

Basic Materials

XOUT
0.6%
IOO
1.7%

Real Estate

XOUT
0.4%
IOO
0.2%

Energy

XOUT
0.2%
IOO
3.6%

Utilities

XOUT

-

IOO
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOUT vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOUT
XOUT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOUT vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOUTIOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.50

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

3.87

-3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

17.94

-17.02

XOUT vs. IOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOUT Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOUT and IOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOUTIOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

2.84

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.98

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.39

+0.27

Drawdowns

XOUT vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and IOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOUTIOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-55.85%

+24.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.21%

-9.94%

-13.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.77%

-19.19%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

-23.52%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-1.33%

-4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-11.27%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.25%

2.14%

+7.11%

Volatility

XOUT vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 3.81%. This indicates that XOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOUTIOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

3.81%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.17%

10.59%

+5.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

13.54%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.78%

17.04%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

17.78%

+5.45%

XOUT vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOUT vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
0.82%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%
XOUT
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.40%0.51%0.28%0.53%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOUT and IOO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOUT has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to IOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOUT dropped -31.29% vs IOO's -55.85%.

On 5-year performance, IOO leads with 16.68% vs 10.93% for XOUT. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.68% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XOUT.

IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.

XOUT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IOO is Global Equities. XOUT tracks XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 0.40% for IOO.

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOUT and IOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer