PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOUT vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XOUT vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XOUT vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -18.03% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 8.17% return.


XOUT

1D
2.94%
1M
-5.98%
YTD
-18.03%
6M
-16.05%
1Y
5.30%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*

FMTM

1D
4.80%
1M
-6.51%
YTD
8.17%
6M
16.49%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XOUT vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XOUT vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOUT
XOUT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOUT vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOUTFMTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

1.58

-1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

2.09

-1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.29

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

3.15

-2.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.68

11.97

-11.29

XOUT vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOUT Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOUT and FMTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOUTFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

1.58

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.61

-1.05

Correlation

The correlation between XOUT and FMTM is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XOUT vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XOUT
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.40%0.51%0.28%0.53%0.19%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XOUT vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and FMTM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XOUTFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-12.12%

-19.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.21%

-12.12%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.44%

-7.90%

-12.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-1.88%

-6.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.10%

3.19%

+3.91%

Volatility

XOUT vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) is 6.74%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 11.09%. This indicates that XOUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XOUTFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

11.09%

-4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

19.22%

-4.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.87%

23.34%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.44%

23.18%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.17%

23.18%

-0.01%