PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOUT vs. BIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XOUT vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XOUT vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XOUT
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF
-18.03%18.18%23.11%42.32%-28.18%26.13%28.71%11.32%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
4.92%17.27%12.49%17.87%-23.26%27.44%22.62%10.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -18.03% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 4.92% return.


XOUT

1D
2.94%
1M
-5.98%
YTD
-18.03%
6M
-16.05%
1Y
5.30%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*

BIBL

1D
3.22%
1M
-5.73%
YTD
4.92%
6M
6.80%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XOUT vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XOUT vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOUT
XOUT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOUT vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOUTBIBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

1.20

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

1.72

-1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.25

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

1.78

-1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.68

8.47

-7.79

XOUT vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOUT Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOUT and BIBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOUTBIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

1.20

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.42

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.53

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between XOUT and BIBL is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XOUT vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOUT
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.40%0.51%0.28%0.53%0.19%0.00%0.00%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
1.12%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%

Drawdowns

XOUT vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and BIBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XOUTBIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-36.12%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.21%

-13.93%

-9.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

-30.85%

-0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.44%

-6.01%

-14.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-7.17%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.10%

2.93%

+4.17%

Volatility

XOUT vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) have volatilities of 6.74% and 6.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XOUTBIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

6.90%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

12.24%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.87%

20.37%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.44%

19.44%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.17%

21.15%

+2.02%