XOUT vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XOUT (GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOUT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. XOUT is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, XOUT returned -0.34% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOUT charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

XOUT vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -10.33% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.18% return.

XOUT

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -4.09%
• YTD: -10.33%
• 6M: -11.73%
• 1Y: -0.34%
• 3Y*: 15.07%
• 5Y*: 8.53%
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOUT vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF	-10.33%	18.18%	23.11%	20.44%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between XOUT and BAMU is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	0.02

The correlation between XOUT and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XOUT vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOUT

XOUT Risk / Return Rank: 8
XOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
XOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
XOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 8
XOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
XOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 8

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOUT vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XOUT	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	4.94	-4.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	8.71	-8.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	2.41	-1.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	24.37	-24.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.04	96.52	-96.56

XOUT vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOUT Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOUT and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XOUT vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOUT	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.29%	-0.36%	-30.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.21%	-0.12%	-23.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.97%	0.00%	-12.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-0.02%	-8.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.55%	0.03%	+9.52%

Volatility

XOUT vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that XOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XOUT	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.52%	0.09%	+8.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.61%	0.39%	+16.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.02%	0.58%	+19.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.87%	0.87%	+21.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.22%	0.87%	+22.35%

XOUT vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

XOUT vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	0.51%	0.28%	0.53%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOUT and BAMU in my portfolio?

XOUT and BAMU have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XOUT or BAMU?

XOUT has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOUT dropped -31.29% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, XOUT or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.87% vs -0.34% for XOUT. On fees, XOUT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XOUT or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.87% return vs -0.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XOUT or BAMU?

XOUT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XOUT or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.

What is the main difference between XOUT and BAMU?

XOUT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.