PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOUT vs. ALTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOUT vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 16.90% return.


XOUT

1D
-2.27%
1M
9.28%
YTD
-3.24%
6M
-4.85%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*

ALTL

1D
-0.66%
1M
12.43%
YTD
16.90%
6M
16.56%
1Y
44.84%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOUT vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XOUT
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF
-3.24%18.18%23.11%42.32%-28.18%26.13%24.82%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
16.90%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%45.30%33.74%

Correlation

The correlation between XOUT and ALTL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.55

The correlation between XOUT and ALTL shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XOUT vs. ALTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOUT
ALTL

Technology

35.1%
4.6%

Healthcare

17.3%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
5.7%

Communication Services

12.4%
0.8%

Financial Services

9.6%
16.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
10.8%

Industrials

3.3%
10.2%

Basic Materials

0.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.4%
14.8%

Energy

0.2%
0.9%

Utilities

-

26.8%

Technology

XOUT
35.1%
ALTL
4.6%

Healthcare

XOUT
17.3%
ALTL
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XOUT
15.4%
ALTL
5.7%

Communication Services

XOUT
12.4%
ALTL
0.8%

Financial Services

XOUT
9.6%
ALTL
16.6%

Consumer Defensive

XOUT
5.7%
ALTL
10.8%

Industrials

XOUT
3.3%
ALTL
10.2%

Basic Materials

XOUT
0.6%
ALTL
2.0%

Real Estate

XOUT
0.4%
ALTL
14.8%

Energy

XOUT
0.2%
ALTL
0.9%

Utilities

XOUT

-

ALTL
26.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOUT vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOUT
XOUT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOUT vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOUTALTLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.44

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

4.60

-4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

16.35

-15.42

XOUT vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOUT Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOUT and ALTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOUTALTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

2.51

-2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.28

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.73

-0.06

Drawdowns

XOUT vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, roughly equal to the maximum ALTL drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and ALTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOUTALTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-31.91%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.21%

-9.79%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.77%

-21.21%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

-31.91%

+0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-0.66%

-5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-11.58%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.25%

2.75%

+6.50%

Volatility

XOUT vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) have volatilities of 7.48% and 7.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOUTALTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

7.26%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.17%

10.97%

+5.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

18.05%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.78%

18.38%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

20.09%

+3.14%

XOUT vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XOUT and ALTL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

XOUT vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
0.94%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%0.00%
XOUT
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.40%0.51%0.28%0.53%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOUT and ALTL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOUT has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to ALTL (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOUT dropped -31.29% vs ALTL's -31.91%.

On 5-year performance, XOUT leads with 10.93% vs 5.04% for ALTL. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, ALTL has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XOUT has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOUT and ALTL have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

ALTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.

XOUT tracks XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Pacer.

ALTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOUT and ALTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer