PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMO vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMO vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -35.55% return.


XOMO

1D
3.50%
1M
-0.94%
6M
11.69%
YTD
13.80%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTY

1D
-2.03%
1M
-23.27%
6M
-39.01%
YTD
-35.55%
1Y
-73.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMO vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
13.80%6.90%3.09%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-35.55%-42.71%212.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XOMO and MSTY is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024

0.04

The correlation between XOMO and MSTY shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMO vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMO vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMOMSTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.75

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

-0.95

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.67

-1.41

+4.08

XOMO vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMO and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOMO vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -77.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and MSTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMOMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-77.40%

+58.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.25%

-77.40%

+60.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.54%

-74.66%

+62.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-28.01%

+20.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.74%

52.19%

-45.45%

Volatility

XOMO vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is 8.02%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 23.76%. This indicates that XOMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMOMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

23.76%

-15.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.35%

53.06%

-35.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.82%

64.61%

-43.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

72.32%

-53.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

72.32%

-53.09%

XOMO vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMO vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.53%, less than MSTY's 289.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
289.43%294.61%104.56%0.00%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
35.53%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOMO and MSTY have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTY has higher volatility (23.76%) compared to XOMO (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMO dropped -18.90% vs MSTY's -77.40%.

On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 17.66% vs -73.76% for MSTY. On fees, MSTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, XOMO has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 17.66% return vs -73.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 289.43%, compared with 35.53% for XOMO.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 0.99% for MSTY.

XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMO and MSTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer