XOMO vs. MSTY
XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XOMO returned 30.87% vs -61.25% for MSTY. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOMO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MSTY.
Performance
XOMO vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -14.73% return.
XOMO
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 30.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -6.76%
- 1M
- -28.46%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -26.86%
- 1Y
- -61.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOMO vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 17.25% | 6.90% | 2.56% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -14.73% | -42.71% | 200.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOMO and MSTY is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOMO vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
XOMO
MSTY
XOMO vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOMO | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | -1.02 | +2.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.06 | -1.73 | +3.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.81 | +0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | -0.86 | +3.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | -1.31 | +7.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOMO | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | -1.02 | +2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.26 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
XOMO vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOMO | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -71.79% | +52.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -71.79% | +58.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.89% | -66.48% | +56.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -26.09% | +18.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 46.87% | -41.99% |
Volatility
XOMO vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is 7.53%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 17.01%. This indicates that XOMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOMO | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 17.01% | -9.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.61% | 48.79% | -32.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 60.44% | -40.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 71.92% | -52.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 71.92% | -52.97% |
XOMO vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOMO vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.77%, less than MSTY's 269.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 269.45% | 294.61% | 104.56% | 0.00% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 34.77% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOMO and MSTY have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to XOMO (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMO dropped -18.90% vs MSTY's -71.79%.
On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 30.87% vs -61.25% for MSTY. On fees, MSTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, XOMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 30.87% return vs -61.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 269.45%, compared with 34.77% for XOMO.
Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 0.99% for MSTY.
XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOMO and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer