PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMO vs. BAGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMO vs. BAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly higher than BAGY's -21.90% return.


XOMO

1D
1.39%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
17.25%
6M
19.54%
1Y
30.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAGY

1D
-2.73%
1M
-20.28%
YTD
-21.90%
6M
-24.70%
1Y
-37.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMO vs. BAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOMO and BAGY is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMO vs. BAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BAGY
BAGY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMO vs. BAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOMOBAGYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

-0.89

+2.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

-1.20

+3.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.86

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

-0.78

+3.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.35

-1.41

+7.76

XOMO vs. BAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the BAGY Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMO and BAGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOMOBAGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

-0.89

+2.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

-0.66

+1.05

Drawdowns

XOMO vs. BAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum BAGY drawdown of -47.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and BAGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMOBAGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-47.52%

+28.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

-47.52%

+33.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.89%

-45.06%

+35.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-19.61%

+12.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

26.28%

-21.40%

Volatility

XOMO vs. BAGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is 7.53%, while Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that XOMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMOBAGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

9.89%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.61%

33.39%

-16.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

41.93%

-21.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

40.86%

-21.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

40.86%

-21.91%

XOMO vs. BAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BAGY's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMO vs. BAGY - Dividend Comparison

XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.77%, less than BAGY's 58.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAGY
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF
58.25%30.16%0.00%0.00%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
34.77%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOMO and BAGY have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAGY has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to XOMO (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMO dropped -18.90% vs BAGY's -47.52%.

On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 30.87% vs -37.04% for BAGY. On fees, BAGY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, XOMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 30.87% return vs -37.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BAGY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

BAGY has the higher dividend yield at 58.25%, compared with 34.77% for XOMO.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 0.65% for BAGY.

XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMO and BAGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer