XOMO vs. ARMW
XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.22 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. XOMO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
XOMO vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 20.26% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 134.95% return.
XOMO
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 20.26%
- 1Y
- 29.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.86%
ARMW
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -28.55%
- 6M
- 146.99%
- YTD
- 134.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.87M | $4.86M | $4.12M | |
| $613.93K | $674.71K | $709.58K |
XOMO vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 20.26% | 4.18% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 134.95% | -41.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOMO and ARMW is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOMO vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
XOMO
ARMW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XOMO vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOMO | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOMO vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOMO | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -56.50% | +37.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.57% | -52.71% | +45.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -27.18% | +19.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.90% | — | — |
Volatility
XOMO vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOMO | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.68% | 96.03% | -75.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 96.03% | -76.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 96.03% | -76.83% |
XOMO vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOMO vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.04%, less than ARMW's 62.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 62.70% | 16.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 37.04% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOMO and ARMW have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 62.70%, compared with 37.04% for XOMO.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for XOMO and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer