XOM vs. VOT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) is a stock, while VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, XOM returned 10.04%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for VOT. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XOM vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOM achieves a 27.80% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, XOM has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 10.04%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.

XOM

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 5.68%
• YTD: 27.80%
• 6M: 32.61%
• 1Y: 50.17%
• 3Y*: 16.03%
• 5Y*: 23.83%
• 10Y*: 10.04%

VOT

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 5.49%
• 6M: 3.73%
• 1Y: 7.75%
• 3Y*: 15.09%
• 5Y*: 6.19%
• 10Y*: 11.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOM vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation	27.80%	15.98%	11.26%	-6.26%	87.41%	57.58%	-36.21%	7.23%	-15.09%	-3.81%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	5.49%	10.72%	16.38%	23.10%	-28.87%	20.50%	34.50%	33.76%	-5.56%	21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XOM and VOT is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2006	0.46

The correlation between XOM and VOT shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XOM vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOM

XOM Risk / Return Rank: 86
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 84
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 86

VOT

VOT Risk / Return Rank: 17
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 16
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOM vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XOM	VOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	0.48	+1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	0.77	+1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.09	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	0.49	+2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.97	1.46	+7.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XOM vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOM and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XOM	VOT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	0.48	+1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	0.29	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.57	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.44	+0.03

Drawdowns

XOM vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and VOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOM	VOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.40%	-60.16%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.69%	-15.96%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.92%	-21.77%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.51%	-37.19%	+16.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.34%	-37.19%	-24.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.90%	-3.48%	-7.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.20%	-9.96%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.61%	5.33%	+0.28%

Volatility

XOM vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a higher volatility of 9.20% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 5.45%. This indicates that XOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XOM	VOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.20%	5.45%	+3.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.29%	12.85%	+7.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.44%	16.20%	+8.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.73%	21.41%	+5.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.19%	21.02%	+7.17%

Dividends

XOM vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than VOT's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.63%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.78%	0.34%	0.56%	0.78%	0.84%	0.72%	0.81%	0.81%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation	2.69%	3.32%	3.57%	3.68%	3.22%	5.70%	8.44%	4.92%	4.74%	3.66%	3.30%	3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOM and VOT in my portfolio?

XOM and VOT have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XOM or VOT?

XOM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to VOT (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs VOT's -60.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.