XOM vs. PLMR
XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) and PLMR (Palomar Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. XOM operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy), while PLMR operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, XOM returned 23.23%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for PLMR. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XOM vs. PLMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOM achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly higher than PLMR's -14.77% return.
XOM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -6.91%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- 1Y
- 35.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 23.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
PLMR
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- -14.77%
- 6M
- -9.27%
- 1Y
- -28.63%
- 3Y*
- 25.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
XOM vs. PLMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 23.81% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | -10.94% |
PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc. | -14.77% | 27.63% | 90.25% | 22.90% | -30.28% | -27.09% | 75.96% | 172.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOM and PLMR is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | 0.14 |
The correlation between XOM and PLMR shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
XOM:
$614.94B
PLMR:
$3.14B
XOM:
$5.93
PLMR:
$7.18
XOM:
24.80
PLMR:
15.99
XOM:
1.15
PLMR:
0.37
XOM:
1.93
PLMR:
3.22
XOM:
2.42
PLMR:
3.27
XOM:
$326.01B
PLMR:
$977.99M
XOM:
$83.11B
PLMR:
$401.29M
XOM:
$60.44B
PLMR:
$210.26M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOM vs. PLMR — Risk / Return Rank
XOM
PLMR
XOM vs. PLMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOM | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.88 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | -0.77 | +3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | -1.19 | +7.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOM vs. PLMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, roughly equal to the maximum PLMR drawdown of -62.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and PLMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOM | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -62.86% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.69% | -37.51% | +21.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.92% | -42.27% | +23.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.51% | -53.81% | +33.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.68% | -34.62% | +20.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -28.81% | +18.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 24.17% | -18.33% |
Volatility
XOM vs. PLMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is 9.08%, while Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that XOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOM | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.08% | 11.03% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.51% | 23.78% | -3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.51% | 36.57% | -12.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 42.68% | -15.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.20% | 47.88% | -19.68% |
Dividends
XOM vs. PLMR - Dividend Comparison
XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, while PLMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.78% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
XOM vs. PLMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exxon Mobil Corporation and Palomar Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
XOM vs. PLMR - Profitability Comparison
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
PLMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
PLMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
PLMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 42.95M and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
XOM and PLMR have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLMR has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to XOM (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs PLMR's -62.86%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOM and PLMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer