XOM vs. FLKR
XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) is a stock, while FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) is South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, XOM returned 22.21%/yr vs 17.20%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XOM vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOM achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 88.17% return.
XOM
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- 16.96%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.15%
- 5Y*
- 22.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- 6M
- 69.24%
- YTD
- 88.17%
- 1Y
- 153.09%
- 3Y*
- 45.44%
- 5Y*
- 17.20%
- 10Y*
- —
XOM vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 16.96% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | 1.48% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 88.17% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOM and FLKR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.25 |
The correlation between XOM and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOM vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
XOM
FLKR
XOM vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.47 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 6.61 | -5.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.24 | 20.76 | -17.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOM vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -50.06% | -12.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.11% | -23.03% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.11% | -26.39% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.51% | -48.14% | +27.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.46% | -16.53% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -21.93% | +11.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.65% | 7.32% | +0.33% |
Volatility
XOM vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is 7.89%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 24.66%. This indicates that XOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.89% | 24.66% | -16.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.76% | 46.71% | -25.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.73% | 49.65% | -24.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 30.98% | -4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.25% | 29.12% | -0.87% |
Dividends
XOM vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than FLKR's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 2.45% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.94% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOM and FLKR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (24.66%) compared to XOM (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOM and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer