PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOEF vs. IBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOEF vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's -27.15% return.


XOEF

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.24%
6M
8.68%
YTD
13.96%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.24%

IBM

1D
0.16%
1M
-14.49%
6M
-29.40%
YTD
-27.15%
1Y
-23.58%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
7.64%
ALL TIME*
7.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEF vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOEF and IBM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOEF vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEF
XOEF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XOEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOEF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XOEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOEF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEF vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOEFIBMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.94

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

-0.66

+3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.52

-1.53

+11.05

XOEF vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOEF and IBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOEF vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum IBM drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and IBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOEFIBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-69.40%

+61.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.66%

-35.85%

+28.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-35.30%

+32.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-20.12%

+18.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

15.44%

-13.44%

Volatility

XOEF vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) is 3.32%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 32.02%. This indicates that XOEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOEFIBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

32.02%

-28.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

46.34%

-36.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

48.36%

-35.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

29.86%

-17.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.76%

27.97%

-15.21%

Dividends

XOEF vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than IBM's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
3.16%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%
XOEF
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
1.06%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOEF and IBM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBM has higher volatility (32.02%) compared to XOEF (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEF dropped -7.66% vs IBM's -69.40%.

XOEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOEF and IBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer