IBM vs. AAPL
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBM or AAPL.
|5Y Return (Ann)||4.41%||25.98%|
|10Y Return (Ann)||1.76%||27.44%|
|Daily Std Dev||18.80%||28.09%|
|Gross Profit (TTM)||$32.69B||$170.78B|
The correlation between IBM and AAPL is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
IBM vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBM achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 32.33% return. Over the past 10 years, IBM has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 1.76%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 27.44% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
IBM vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than AAPL's 0.55% yield.
IBM vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Apple Inc. (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
IBM vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBM drawdown for the period was -17.61%, lower than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -13.13%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for IBM and AAPL
IBM vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is 4.63%, while Apple Inc. (AAPL) has a volatility of 6.63%. This indicates that IBM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.