XOEF vs. IBIT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT).

XOEF and IBIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XOEF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2025. IBIT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. It was launched on Jan 5, 2024. Both XOEF and IBIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XOEF vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XOEF vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF	2.96%	4.15%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-22.18%	-21.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.18% return.

XOEF

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -4.86%
• YTD: 2.96%
• 6M: 3.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -1.42%
• YTD: -22.18%
• 6M: -42.10%
• 1Y: -20.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEF vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

IBIT

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF

XOEF

iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF

Return for Risk

XOEF vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 6
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEF vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XOEF	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.36	+0.43

Correlation

The correlation between XOEF and IBIT is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XOEF vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF	0.87%	0.63%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

XOEF vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOEF	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.66%	-49.36%	+41.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.97%	-45.80%	+40.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.43%	-14.18%	+12.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XOEF	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.82%	45.40%	-32.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.82%	51.21%	-38.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.82%	51.21%	-38.39%