PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOEF vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOEF vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.


XOEF

1D
-1.83%
1M
1.36%
YTD
12.43%
6M
12.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.03%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.47%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEF vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOEF and IBIC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOEF vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEF

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEF vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XOEF vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOEFIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

3.48

-1.99

Drawdowns

XOEF vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOEFIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-0.90%

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.13%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-0.10%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

Volatility

XOEF vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOEFIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

0.90%

+11.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

1.57%

+11.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.73%

1.57%

+11.16%

XOEF vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XOEF vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%
XOEF
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
0.80%0.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOEF and IBIC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XOEF.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.80% for XOEF.

XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.10% for IBIC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOEF and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer