PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOEF vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOEF vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 61.34% return.


XOEF

1D
-1.83%
1M
1.36%
YTD
12.43%
6M
12.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HIBL

1D
-17.42%
1M
1.67%
YTD
61.34%
6M
58.32%
1Y
216.38%
3Y*
50.00%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEF vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOEF and HIBL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOEF vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEF

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEF vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XOEF vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOEFHIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

0.20

+1.29

Drawdowns

XOEF vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOEFHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-88.27%

+80.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-19.65%

+17.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-44.16%

+42.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.64%

Volatility

XOEF vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOEFHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

68.38%

-55.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

82.50%

-69.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.73%

92.10%

-79.37%

XOEF vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOEF vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than HIBL's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.43%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%
XOEF
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
0.80%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOEF and HIBL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XOEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XOEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.80% for XOEF.

XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 1.12% for HIBL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOEF and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer