XOEF vs. HIBL
XOEF (iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF) and HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEF is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while HIBL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for HIBL.
Performance
XOEF vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 91.84% return.
XOEF
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 16.44%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIBL
- 1D
- 5.89%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 91.84%
- 6M
- 82.82%
- 1Y
- 202.29%
- 3Y*
- 50.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- —
XOEF vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 16.44% | 4.27% |
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 91.84% | 45.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEF and HIBL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEF vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank
XOEF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HIBL
XOEF vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOEF | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.49 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOEF vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and HIBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEF | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -88.27% | +80.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -69.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.08% | +8.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -43.82% | +42.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.09% | — |
Volatility
XOEF vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEF | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 37.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 60.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 73.84% | -60.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 83.40% | -70.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 92.44% | -79.55% |
XOEF vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOEF vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison
XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than HIBL's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 1.18% | 2.43% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 1.04% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEF and HIBL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XOEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XOEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.
HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 1.04% for XOEF.
XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 1.12% for HIBL.
Find the right allocation for XOEF and HIBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer