XNTK vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

XNTK (State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. XNTK is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, XNTK returned 51.65% vs 282.56% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

XNTK vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 28.94% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -23.27% return.

XNTK

• 1D: -2.95%
• 1M: -2.95%
• 6M: 24.19%
• YTD: 28.94%
• 1Y: 51.65%
• 3Y*: 35.76%
• 5Y*: 18.39%
• 10Y*: 24.56%

MSTZ

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 46.38%
• 6M: -9.68%
• YTD: -23.27%
• 1Y: 282.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNTK vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF	28.94%	38.06%	7.71%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-23.27%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and MSTZ is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.48

Return for Risk

XNTK vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNTK

XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 69
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 66
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 67

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNTK vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XNTK	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.92	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	2.45	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.32	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	3.35	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.62	6.53	+3.09

XNTK vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNTK	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.38%	-99.38%	+27.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.00%	-84.89%	+67.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.36%	-97.39%	+89.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.23%	-94.53%	+73.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.39%	43.51%	-38.12%

Volatility

XNTK vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) is 13.87%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that XNTK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNTK	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.87%	56.56%	-42.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.76%	135.11%	-111.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.05%	148.53%	-120.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.78%	171.02%	-142.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.03%	171.02%	-143.99%

XNTK vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNTK vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF	0.15%	0.23%	0.42%	0.34%	0.85%	0.34%	0.30%	0.61%	29.64%	1.29%	0.81%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNTK and MSTZ in my portfolio?

XNTK and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XNTK or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to XNTK (13.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, XNTK or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs 51.65% for XNTK. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XNTK has been the lower-risk option at 13.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XNTK or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs 51.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNTK or MSTZ?

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XNTK or MSTZ?

XNTK has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between XNTK and MSTZ?

XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.