XNTK vs. HDV
XNTK (State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XNTK returned 24.07%/yr vs 9.28%/yr for HDV. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
XNTK vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 24.79% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 18.49% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 24.07%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.28% annualized return.
XNTK
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- 6M
- 21.81%
- YTD
- 24.79%
- 1Y
- 45.38%
- 3Y*
- 33.60%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 24.07%
HDV
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- YTD
- 18.49%
- 1Y
- 23.14%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
XNTK vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 24.79% | 38.06% | 23.49% | 70.13% | -41.07% | 17.63% | 73.91% | 38.08% | -7.13% | 40.37% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 18.49% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNTK and HDV is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.44 |
The correlation between XNTK and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XNTK vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XNTK
HDV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XNTK
HDV
Communication Services
XNTK
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
XNTK
HDV
Basic Materials
XNTK
-
HDV
Consumer Defensive
XNTK
-
HDV
Energy
XNTK
-
HDV
Financial Services
XNTK
-
HDV
Healthcare
XNTK
-
HDV
Industrials
XNTK
-
HDV
Real Estate
XNTK
-
HDV
-
Utilities
XNTK
-
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNTK vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
XNTK
HDV
XNTK vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNTK | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.38 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 4.49 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.31 | 12.27 | -3.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNTK vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNTK | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.38% | -37.04% | -35.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.00% | -5.18% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.11% | -10.49% | -17.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.28% | -15.42% | -32.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | -37.04% | -11.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.31% | 0.00% | -11.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.22% | -3.07% | -18.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 1.89% | +3.59% |
Volatility
XNTK vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 5.12%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNTK | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.54% | 5.12% | +7.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.01% | 8.63% | +15.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.23% | 10.72% | +17.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.81% | 12.95% | +15.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.05% | 15.77% | +11.28% |
XNTK vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNTK vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than HDV's 3.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.11% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.15% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNTK and HDV have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XNTK has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to HDV (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 24.07% vs 9.28% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 24.07% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.15% for XNTK.
XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while HDV is Dividend. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XNTK and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer