PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNTK vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNTK vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 24.79% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 18.49% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 24.07%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.28% annualized return.


XNTK

1D
-2.80%
1M
-6.90%
6M
21.81%
YTD
24.79%
1Y
45.38%
3Y*
33.60%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
24.07%

HDV

1D
2.57%
1M
3.57%
6M
13.53%
YTD
18.49%
1Y
23.14%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
9.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNTK vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
24.79%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
18.49%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and HDV is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011

0.44

The correlation between XNTK and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XNTK vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XNTK
HDV

Technology

83.3%
0.2%

Communication Services

8.6%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
9.2%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

24.5%

Energy

-

19.6%

Financial Services

-

4.8%

Healthcare

-

23.7%

Industrials

-

3.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

8.2%

Technology

XNTK
83.3%
HDV
0.2%

Communication Services

XNTK
8.6%
HDV
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XNTK
8.0%
HDV
9.2%

Basic Materials

XNTK

-

HDV
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

XNTK

-

HDV
24.5%

Energy

XNTK

-

HDV
19.6%

Financial Services

XNTK

-

HDV
4.8%

Healthcare

XNTK

-

HDV
23.7%

Industrials

XNTK

-

HDV
3.6%

Real Estate

XNTK

-

HDV

-

Utilities

XNTK

-

HDV
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNTK vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNTK vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNTKHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

4.49

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.31

12.27

-3.96

XNTK vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNTKHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-37.04%

-35.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-5.18%

-11.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-10.49%

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-15.42%

-32.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-37.04%

-11.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.31%

0.00%

-11.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.22%

-3.07%

-18.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

1.89%

+3.59%

Volatility

XNTK vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 5.12%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNTKHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.54%

5.12%

+7.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.01%

8.63%

+15.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.23%

10.72%

+17.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.81%

12.95%

+15.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.05%

15.77%

+11.28%

XNTK vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNTK vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than HDV's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
3.11%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.15%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XNTK and HDV have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to HDV (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 24.07% vs 9.28% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 24.07% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.15% for XNTK.

XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while HDV is Dividend. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.08% for HDV.

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer