PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNOV vs. KQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNOV vs. KQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November (XNOV) and Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNOV achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly lower than KQQQ's 16.99% return.


XNOV

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.50%
YTD
4.30%
6M
4.21%
1Y
13.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KQQQ

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.75%
YTD
16.99%
6M
16.94%
1Y
39.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNOV vs. KQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XNOV and KQQQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.76

The correlation between XNOV and KQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNOV vs. KQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNOV
XNOV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

KQQQ
KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNOV vs. KQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November (XNOV) and Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNOVKQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.35

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.28

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.01

7.40

+13.61

XNOV vs. KQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNOV Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the KQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNOV and KQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNOV vs. KQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNOV drawdown since its inception was -10.00%, smaller than the maximum KQQQ drawdown of -26.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNOV and KQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNOVKQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-26.15%

+16.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.60%

-17.30%

+13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-2.86%

+2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-4.69%

+4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

5.31%

-4.69%

Volatility

XNOV vs. KQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November (XNOV) is 1.00%, while Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that XNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNOVKQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

7.69%

-6.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.89%

15.62%

-11.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.33%

19.32%

-14.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.89%

23.66%

-16.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.89%

23.66%

-16.77%

XNOV vs. KQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than KQQQ's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNOV vs. KQQQ - Dividend Comparison

XNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.98%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XNOV and KQQQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KQQQ has higher volatility (7.69%) compared to XNOV (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNOV dropped -10.00% vs KQQQ's -26.15%.

On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 39.20% vs 13.00% for XNOV. On fees, XNOV is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 39.20% return vs 13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNOV is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.

KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 13.98%, compared with 0.00% for XNOV.

XNOV is categorized as Options Trading, while KQQQ is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XNOV and 0.99% for KQQQ.

XNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNOV and KQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer