XNOV vs. PBAP

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

XNOV (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November) and PBAP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XNOV returned 11.44% vs 11.83% for PBAP. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XNOV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBAP.

Performance

XNOV vs. PBAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November (XNOV) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNOV achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly lower than PBAP's 7.01% return.

XNOV

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 6M: 4.56%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBAP

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 7.01%
• 6M: 7.01%
• 1Y: 11.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNOV vs. PBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XNOV FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November	4.56%	11.32%	5.03%
PBAP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April	7.01%	6.34%	8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XNOV and PBAP is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024	0.82

The correlation between XNOV and PBAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XNOV vs. PBAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNOV

XNOV Risk / Return Rank: 89
XNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
XNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 95
XNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

PBAP

PBAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
PBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNOV vs. PBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November (XNOV) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XNOV	PBAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	3.70	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	6.10	-2.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.95	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	10.14	-6.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.41	60.89	-42.48

XNOV vs. PBAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the PBAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNOV and PBAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XNOV vs. PBAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNOV drawdown since its inception was -10.00%, roughly equal to the maximum PBAP drawdown of -9.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNOV and PBAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNOV	PBAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.00%	-9.70%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.60%	-1.17%	-2.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-0.03%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.50%	-0.77%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.62%	0.19%	+0.43%

Volatility

XNOV vs. PBAP - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November (XNOV) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP) have volatilities of 1.29% and 1.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNOV	PBAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.29%	1.29%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.94%	2.34%	+1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.35%	3.21%	+1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.87%	7.02%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.87%	7.02%	-0.15%

XNOV vs. PBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PBAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNOV vs. PBAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNOV nor PBAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNOV and PBAP in my portfolio?

XNOV and PBAP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XNOV or PBAP?

PBAP has higher volatility (1.29%) compared to XNOV (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNOV dropped -10.00% vs PBAP's -9.70%.

Which ETF is better, XNOV or PBAP?

On 1-year performance, PBAP leads with 11.83% vs 11.44% for XNOV. On fees, PBAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XNOV or PBAP?

Over the 1-year period, PBAP has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNOV or PBAP?

PBAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XNOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XNOV or PBAP?

XNOV and PBAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XNOV and PBAP?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XNOV and 0.50% for PBAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.