PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNKY.DE vs. XESC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNKY.DE vs. XESC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNKY.DE achieves a 38.55% return, which is significantly higher than XESC.DE's 9.31% return.


XNKY.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
7.41%
YTD
38.55%
6M
39.35%
1Y
66.87%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*

XESC.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.56%
YTD
9.31%
6M
10.20%
1Y
21.31%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
11.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNKY.DE vs. XESC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
38.55%16.16%14.34%18.03%-15.35%3.16%7.65%
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
9.31%22.24%11.06%22.50%-8.87%23.54%11.55%

Correlation

The correlation between XNKY.DE and XESC.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020

0.58

The correlation between XNKY.DE and XESC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNKY.DE vs. XESC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNKY.DE
XNKY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

XESC.DE
XESC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNKY.DE vs. XESC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNKY.DEXESC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.25

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

1.96

+3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.47

6.81

+8.66

XNKY.DE vs. XESC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNKY.DE and XESC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNKY.DE vs. XESC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNKY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, smaller than the maximum XESC.DE drawdown of -46.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNKY.DE and XESC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNKY.DEXESC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.47%

-46.74%

+25.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-10.88%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.16%

-16.53%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

-23.33%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.10%

-1.71%

-2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-9.06%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

3.13%

+1.20%

Volatility

XNKY.DE vs. XESC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) at 3.52%. This indicates that XNKY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XESC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNKY.DEXESC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

3.52%

+5.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.16%

13.23%

+6.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.08%

16.03%

+9.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

17.56%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

17.98%

+0.68%

XNKY.DE vs. XESC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XNKY.DE and XESC.DE have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XNKY.DE vs. XESC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNKY.DE nor XESC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XNKY.DE and XESC.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNKY.DE and XESC.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

XNKY.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while XESC.DE is Europe Equities. XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®, while XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNKY.DE and XESC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer