XNKY.DE vs. LCUJ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE).
XNKY.DE and LCUJ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNKY.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Nikkei 225®. It was launched on Oct 27, 2020. LCUJ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan. It was launched on Feb 28, 2018. Both XNKY.DE and LCUJ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XNKY.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XNKY.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNKY.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF | 8.17% | 16.16% | 14.34% | 18.03% | -15.35% | 3.16% | 13.56% |
LCUJ.DE Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 3.75% | 12.70% | 13.58% | 16.52% | -12.48% | 10.04% | 9.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNKY.DE achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than LCUJ.DE's 3.75% return.
XNKY.DE
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- 1Y
- 36.37%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- —
LCUJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 19.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.97%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XNKY.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNKY.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LCUJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XNKY.DE vs. LCUJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNKY.DE
LCUJ.DE
XNKY.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNKY.DE | LCUJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.53 | 0.91 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 1.36 | +0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.19 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 1.73 | +1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.73 | 5.61 | +3.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNKY.DE | LCUJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 0.91 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.42 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.44 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between XNKY.DE and LCUJ.DE is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XNKY.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNKY.DE nor LCUJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XNKY.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNKY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, smaller than the maximum LCUJ.DE drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNKY.DE and LCUJ.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNKY.DE | LCUJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.47% | -28.01% | +6.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -11.07% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.15% | -19.10% | -2.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.83% | -9.19% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -5.99% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 3.41% | +0.78% |
Volatility
XNKY.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) at 8.86%. This indicates that XNKY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCUJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XNKY.DE | LCUJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 8.86% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.79% | 13.97% | +3.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.71% | 20.16% | +3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 16.34% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 16.96% | +1.05% |