XESC.DE vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
XESC.DE and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XESC.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Aug 29, 2008. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both XESC.DE and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XESC.DE or SCHG.
Key characteristics
| XESC.DE | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.57% | 22.17% |
| 1Y Return | 17.41% | 34.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.51% | 9.95% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.15% | 19.68% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.11% | 15.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.43 | 2.00 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.80% | 17.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.71% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.55% | -4.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XESC.DE and SCHG is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XESC.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XESC.DE achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 22.17% return. Over the past 10 years, XESC.DE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 7.11%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.99% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XESC.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XESC.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XESC.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XESC.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
XESC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XESC.DE Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.27% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
XESC.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XESC.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.71%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESC.DE and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XESC.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) is 3.95%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that XESC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.