XESC.DE vs. SXRT.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) and iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SXRT.DE).
XESC.DE and SXRT.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XESC.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Aug 29, 2008. SXRT.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the EURO STOXX® 50. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both XESC.DE and SXRT.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XESC.DE or SXRT.DE.
Key characteristics
| XESC.DE | SXRT.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.92% | 8.93% |
| 1Y Return | 16.71% | 16.79% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.37% | 6.37% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.16% | 8.17% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.57% | 7.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.15 | 1.15 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.65 | 1.66 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.53 | 1.52 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.30 | 5.32 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.81% | 2.82% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.08% | 13.12% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.71% | -38.41% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.23% | -5.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between XESC.DE and SXRT.DE is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XESC.DE vs. SXRT.DE - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XESC.DE having a 8.92% return and SXRT.DE slightly higher at 8.93%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XESC.DE having a 7.57% annualized return and SXRT.DE not far ahead at 7.59%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XESC.DE vs. SXRT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XESC.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SXRT.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XESC.DE vs. SXRT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) and iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SXRT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XESC.DE vs. SXRT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XESC.DE nor SXRT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XESC.DE Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.19% |
SXRT.DE iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XESC.DE vs. SXRT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XESC.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.71%, which is greater than SXRT.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESC.DE and SXRT.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XESC.DE vs. SXRT.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) and iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SXRT.DE) have volatilities of 5.56% and 5.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.