PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNKY.DE vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNKY.DE vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XNKY.DE is traded in EUR, while SPYG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNKY.DE achieves a 32.35% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 15.02% return.


XNKY.DE

1D
-1.43%
1M
10.63%
YTD
32.35%
6M
30.33%
1Y
59.90%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*

SPYG

1D
0.00%
1M
5.42%
YTD
15.02%
6M
12.98%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
17.15%
10Y*
17.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNKY.DE vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
32.35%16.16%14.34%18.03%-15.35%3.16%13.56%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
11.52%7.60%44.97%26.13%-25.04%41.89%7.92%

Correlation

The correlation between XNKY.DE and SPYG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2020

0.39

The correlation between XNKY.DE and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNKY.DE vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNKY.DE
XNKY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNKY.DE vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNKY.DESPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

2.59

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

9.09

+4.82

XNKY.DE vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNKY.DE and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNKY.DESPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.03

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.82

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.70

+0.04

Drawdowns

XNKY.DE vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNKY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -45.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNKY.DE and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNKY.DESPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.47%

-45.25%

+23.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-12.70%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.16%

-27.05%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

-27.05%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-0.98%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-7.58%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

3.61%

+0.68%

Volatility

XNKY.DE vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 3.45%. This indicates that XNKY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNKY.DESPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

3.45%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.61%

11.74%

+6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.59%

16.20%

+7.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.57%

20.90%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

21.03%

-2.61%

XNKY.DE vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNKY.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XNKY.DE vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

XNKY.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XNKY.DE and SPYG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XNKY.DE.

XNKY.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XNKY.DE and 0.04% for SPYG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNKY.DE and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer