XNAV vs. GSG
XNAV (FundX Aggressive ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by FundX, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. XNAV is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNAV returned 25.36%/yr vs 18.78%/yr for GSG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
XNAV vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAV achieves a 23.49% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 40.46% return.
XNAV
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 23.49%
- 6M
- 24.32%
- 1Y
- 43.79%
- 3Y*
- 25.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 40.46%
- 6M
- 38.18%
- 1Y
- 49.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
XNAV vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF | 23.49% | 13.61% | 25.44% | 16.11% | 7.03% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 40.46% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | -2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAV and GSG is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022 | 0.12 |
The correlation between XNAV and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAV vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
XNAV
GSG
XNAV vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAV | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.39 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 5.28 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.09 | 13.78 | +2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAV | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.17 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | -0.09 | +1.38 |
Drawdowns
XNAV vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAV drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAV and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAV | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.27% | -89.62% | +65.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -9.46% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.27% | -14.94% | -9.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -57.59% | +56.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -63.71% | +60.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 3.62% | -0.89% |
Volatility
XNAV vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) is 5.28%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.72%. This indicates that XNAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAV | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.28% | 7.72% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | 20.48% | -6.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.55% | 23.01% | -6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 22.61% | -3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 22.03% | -3.30% |
XNAV vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNAV vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
XNAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.09% | 1.21% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNAV and GSG have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to XNAV (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNAV dropped -24.27% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 3-year performance, XNAV leads with 25.36% vs 18.78% for GSG. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XNAV has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XNAV has performed better with a 25.36% return vs 18.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for XNAV.
XNAV has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
XNAV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: FundX and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for XNAV and 0.75% for GSG.
XNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XNAV and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer