XNAS.DE vs. NADQ.DE
XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the Nasdaq 100®, from Xtrackers and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNAS.DE returned 18.79%/yr vs 18.92%/yr for NADQ.DE. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XNAS.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for NADQ.DE.
Performance
XNAS.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XNAS.DE having a 20.53% return and NADQ.DE slightly higher at 20.63%.
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 9.23%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 6M
- 19.39%
- 1Y
- 37.85%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- —
NADQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.24%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 19.44%
- 1Y
- 38.00%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
XNAS.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 20.53% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 51.36% | -29.99% | 33.56% |
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 20.63% | 7.04% | 34.07% | 51.46% | -29.91% | 33.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.DE and NADQ.DE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 1.00 |
The correlation between XNAS.DE and NADQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAS.DE vs. NADQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.DE
NADQ.DE
XNAS.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.DE | NADQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.42 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 3.79 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 11.32 | -0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.DE | NADQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.40 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.94 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.97 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
XNAS.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, smaller than the maximum NADQ.DE drawdown of -33.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and NADQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.DE | NADQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.25% | -33.44% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -9.97% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -26.70% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.25% | -31.16% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.86% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -5.93% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 3.35% | +0.03% |
Volatility
XNAS.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.DE | NADQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.26% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 10.95% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 15.74% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 19.84% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 19.54% | +0.30% |
XNAS.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NADQ.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XNAS.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
XNAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% |
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, XNAS.DE and NADQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for NADQ.DE.
Both ETFs track Nasdaq 100®. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.DE and 0.22% for NADQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNAS.DE and NADQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer