XNAS.DE vs. LYMS.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE).
XNAS.DE and LYMS.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNAS.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. LYMS.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Jan 17, 2019. Both XNAS.DE and LYMS.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XNAS.DE or LYMS.DE.
Key characteristics
| XNAS.DE | LYMS.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 30.53% | 30.50% |
| 1Y Return | 37.85% | 37.88% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.26 | 2.26 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.00 | 2.99 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.42 | 1.42 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.80 | 2.81 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.28 | 9.30 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.05% | 4.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.53% | 16.56% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.13% | -50.00% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.DE and LYMS.DE is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XNAS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XNAS.DE having a 30.53% return and LYMS.DE slightly lower at 30.50%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XNAS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XNAS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XNAS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAS.DE nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% | 0.71% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
XNAS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and LYMS.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XNAS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.