XMWD.L vs. LGGG.L

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

XMWD.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from Xtrackers and Legal & General respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMWD.L returned 11.24%/yr vs 11.47%/yr for LGGG.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMWD.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGGG.L.

Performance

XMWD.L vs. LGGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XMWD.L is traded in USD, while LGGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LGGG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XMWD.L having a 9.86% return and LGGG.L slightly lower at 9.76%.

XMWD.L

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.07%
• 6M: 8.01%
• YTD: 9.86%
• 1Y: 21.40%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 11.24%
• 10Y*: 12.88%

LGGG.L

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 1.28%
• 6M: 7.97%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 1Y: 21.69%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMWD.L vs. LGGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XMWD.L Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C	9.86%	20.84%	18.87%	24.27%	-18.25%	22.03%	16.04%	27.14%	-9.08%
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	9.76%	21.45%	19.11%	24.31%	-18.05%	22.41%	15.85%	27.93%	-29.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XMWD.L and LGGG.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018	0.92

The correlation between XMWD.L and LGGG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMWD.L vs. LGGG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMWD.L	LGGG.L
Technology	31.3%	31.5%
Financial Services	15.1%	15.2%
Industrials	10.9%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	9.4%
Communication Services	8.9%	9.2%
Healthcare	8.6%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.8%	3.6%
Basic Materials	3.2%	3.2%
Utilities	2.4%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

XMWD.L vs. LGGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMWD.L

XMWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
XMWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XMWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
XMWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
XMWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
XMWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

LGGG.L

LGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
LGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
LGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMWD.L vs. LGGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMWD.L	LGGG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.84	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	2.74	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	2.47	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.39	10.47	-0.08

XMWD.L vs. LGGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMWD.L and LGGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMWD.L vs. LGGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMWD.L drawdown since its inception was -55.68%, which is greater than LGGG.L's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMWD.L and LGGG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMWD.L	LGGG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.68%	-37.64%	-18.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-8.74%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.55%	-18.96%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.94%	-26.41%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-0.54%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-8.78%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	2.07%	-0.02%

Volatility

XMWD.L vs. LGGG.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) have volatilities of 3.18% and 3.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMWD.L	LGGG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.18%	3.27%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	9.19%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.31%	11.78%	+0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.69%	20.51%	-4.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.73%	21.78%	-6.05%

XMWD.L vs. LGGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMWD.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LGGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMWD.L vs. LGGG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMWD.L nor LGGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMWD.L and LGGG.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, XMWD.L and LGGG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XMWD.L or LGGG.L?

On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMWD.L or LGGG.L?

LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XMWD.L.

What is the main difference between XMWD.L and LGGG.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XMWD.L and 0.10% for LGGG.L.