PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LGGG.L is traded in GBp, while VUSA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUSA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LGGG.L having a 10.12% return and VUSA.L slightly higher at 10.52%.


LGGG.L

1D
0.07%
1M
5.28%
YTD
10.12%
6M
10.38%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*

VUSA.L

1D
0.03%
1M
5.52%
YTD
10.52%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.10%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LGGG.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
10.12%12.92%21.13%18.08%-8.24%23.53%12.41%22.99%-4.89%
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.52%9.39%27.33%19.81%-9.02%30.98%13.66%26.54%-6.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGG.L and VUSA.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018

0.96

The correlation between LGGG.L and VUSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LGGG.L
VUSA.L

Technology

28.4%
35.7%

Financial Services

15.9%
11.6%

Industrials

10.9%
8.3%

Communication Services

9.7%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.2%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.9%

Energy

4.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.8%

Utilities

2.5%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

LGGG.L
28.4%
VUSA.L
35.7%

Financial Services

LGGG.L
15.9%
VUSA.L
11.6%

Industrials

LGGG.L
10.9%
VUSA.L
8.3%

Communication Services

LGGG.L
9.7%
VUSA.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

LGGG.L
9.4%
VUSA.L
10.2%

Healthcare

LGGG.L
8.8%
VUSA.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

LGGG.L
5.3%
VUSA.L
4.9%

Energy

LGGG.L
4.0%
VUSA.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

LGGG.L
3.2%
VUSA.L
1.8%

Utilities

LGGG.L
2.5%
VUSA.L
2.4%

Real Estate

LGGG.L
1.8%
VUSA.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGG.L
LGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VUSA.L
VUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGGG.LVUSA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.51

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

4.08

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.19

15.02

+1.17

LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGG.L and VUSA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGGG.LVUSA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.74

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

1.04

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

1.06

-0.15

Drawdowns

LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, roughly equal to the maximum VUSA.L drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGG.L and VUSA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGGG.LVUSA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.38%

-25.47%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-7.11%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.68%

-20.94%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.68%

-20.94%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.23%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-3.19%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.93%

-0.25%

Volatility

LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) is 2.47%, while Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that LGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGGG.LVUSA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

2.63%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.32%

7.12%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

10.58%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

14.29%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

15.64%

-0.55%

LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Dividend Comparison

LGGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGGG.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.87%0.95%1.00%1.24%1.41%1.04%1.44%1.50%1.72%1.61%1.58%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, LGGG.L and VUSA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for LGGG.L.

LGGG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VUSA.L is S&P 500. LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGG.L and 0.07% for VUSA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGGG.L and VUSA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer