LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L
LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and VUSA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGGG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VUSA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGGG.L returned 13.23%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for VUSA.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LGGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUSA.L.
Performance
LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LGGG.L is traded in GBp, while VUSA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUSA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LGGG.L having a 10.12% return and VUSA.L slightly higher at 10.52%.
LGGG.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.23%
- 10Y*
- —
VUSA.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 10.52%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 10.12% | 12.92% | 21.13% | 18.08% | -8.24% | 23.53% | 12.41% | 22.99% | -4.89% |
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.52% | 9.39% | 27.33% | 19.81% | -9.02% | 30.98% | 13.66% | 26.54% | -6.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGGG.L and VUSA.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between LGGG.L and VUSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
Financial Services
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
Industrials
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
Communication Services
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
Consumer Cyclical
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
Healthcare
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
Consumer Defensive
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
Energy
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
Basic Materials
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
Utilities
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
Real Estate
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGGG.L
VUSA.L
LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGGG.L | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.51 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 4.08 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.19 | 15.02 | +1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGGG.L | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.74 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 1.04 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.06 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, roughly equal to the maximum VUSA.L drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGG.L and VUSA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGGG.L | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.38% | -25.47% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -7.11% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.68% | -20.94% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.68% | -20.94% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.23% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -3.19% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.93% | -0.25% |
Volatility
LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) is 2.47%, while Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that LGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGGG.L | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 2.63% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 7.12% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 10.58% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 14.29% | -1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 15.64% | -0.55% |
LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LGGG.L vs. VUSA.L - Dividend Comparison
LGGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.87% | 0.95% | 1.00% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.44% | 1.50% | 1.72% | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, LGGG.L and VUSA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for LGGG.L.
LGGG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VUSA.L is S&P 500. LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGG.L and 0.07% for VUSA.L.
Find the right allocation for LGGG.L and VUSA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer