LGGG.L vs. FUQIX
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund (FUQIX).
LGGG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Nov 7, 2018. FUQIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 8, 2015.
Performance
LGGG.L vs. FUQIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LGGG.L vs. FUQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | -1.44% | 12.92% | 21.13% | 18.08% | -8.24% | 23.53% | 12.41% | 22.99% | -4.89% |
FUQIX Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund | -6.71% | 8.44% | 26.50% | 23.15% | -8.35% | 29.50% | 17.13% | 29.54% | -6.41% |
Different Trading Currencies
LGGG.L is traded in GBp, while FUQIX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FUQIX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGGG.L achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly higher than FUQIX's -6.71% return.
LGGG.L
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- -1.44%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 16.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- —
FUQIX
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -6.71%
- 6M
- -5.66%
- 1Y
- 6.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGGG.L vs. FUQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LGGG.L and FUQIX have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
LGGG.L vs. FUQIX — Risk / Return Rank
LGGG.L
FUQIX
LGGG.L vs. FUQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund (FUQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGGG.L | FUQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.39 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 0.68 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.10 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 0.51 | +2.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.54 | 1.71 | +7.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGGG.L | FUQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.39 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.77 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.85 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between LGGG.L and FUQIX is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LGGG.L vs. FUQIX - Dividend Comparison
LGGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FUQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUQIX Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund | 3.97% | 3.63% | 12.80% | 2.38% | 1.42% | 8.55% | 9.46% | 13.68% | 2.41% | 3.79% | 1.57% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
LGGG.L vs. FUQIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, which is greater than FUQIX's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGG.L and FUQIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGGG.L | FUQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.38% | -31.19% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.16% | -12.31% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.68% | -24.96% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -9.68% | +5.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -4.29% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 3.13% | -1.34% |
Volatility
LGGG.L vs. FUQIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) is 4.32%, while Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund (FUQIX) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that LGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LGGG.L | FUQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 4.77% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.17% | 9.83% | -1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.13% | 18.43% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 16.29% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 18.49% | -3.30% |