XMWD.L vs. PHPP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMWD.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and PHPP.L (WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals) are both exchange-traded funds - XMWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while PHPP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Precious Metals Basket. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMWD.L returned 13.01%/yr vs 12.70%/yr for PHPP.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMWD.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for PHPP.L.

Performance

XMWD.L vs. PHPP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) and WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals (PHPP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XMWD.L is traded in USD, while PHPP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PHPP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMWD.L achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than PHPP.L's 0.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XMWD.L having a 13.01% annualized return and PHPP.L not far behind at 12.70%.

XMWD.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 4.02%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 25.86%
• 3Y*: 20.70%
• 5Y*: 11.74%
• 10Y*: 13.01%

PHPP.L

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -2.76%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 10.43%
• 1Y: 50.15%
• 3Y*: 28.54%
• 5Y*: 11.57%
• 10Y*: 12.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMWD.L vs. PHPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMWD.L Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C	9.93%	21.37%	18.35%	23.76%	-17.92%	22.03%	16.04%	28.32%	-9.21%	22.09%
PHPP.L WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals	0.74%	85.47%	15.31%	-3.73%	-0.29%	-11.08%	26.04%	27.32%	-0.53%	15.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XMWD.L and PHPP.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2007	0.19

The correlation between XMWD.L and PHPP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XMWD.L vs. PHPP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMWD.L

XMWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
XMWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XMWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
XMWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XMWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XMWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

PHPP.L

PHPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
PHPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
PHPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
PHPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
PHPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
PHPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMWD.L vs. PHPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) and WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals (PHPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMWD.L	PHPP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.50	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	1.92	+1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.28	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	1.85	+1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.02	4.35	+8.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMWD.L vs. PHPP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the PHPP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMWD.L and PHPP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMWD.L	PHPP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	1.50	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.49	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.61	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.36	+0.07

Drawdowns

XMWD.L vs. PHPP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMWD.L drawdown since its inception was -56.59%, which is greater than PHPP.L's maximum drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMWD.L and PHPP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMWD.L	PHPP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.59%	-52.73%	-3.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-26.99%	+18.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.55%	-26.99%	+9.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.94%	-31.01%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.04%	-31.01%	-3.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-24.70%	+24.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.96%	-23.85%	+15.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	11.50%	-9.52%

Volatility

XMWD.L vs. PHPP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) is 3.41%, while WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals (PHPP.L) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that XMWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMWD.L	PHPP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.41%	8.54%	-5.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.13%	30.64%	-21.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.86%	33.22%	-21.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	23.39%	-7.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.70%	20.85%	-4.15%

XMWD.L vs. PHPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMWD.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PHPP.L's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMWD.L vs. PHPP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMWD.L nor PHPP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMWD.L and PHPP.L in my portfolio?

XMWD.L and PHPP.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMWD.L or PHPP.L?

On fees, PHPP.L is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMWD.L or PHPP.L?

PHPP.L is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XMWD.L.

What is the main difference between XMWD.L and PHPP.L?

XMWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while PHPP.L is Precious Metals. XMWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while PHPP.L tracks Precious Metals Basket. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XMWD.L and 0.44% for PHPP.L.