XMWD.L vs. VXUS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMWD.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds - XMWD.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while VXUS tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMWD.L returned 13.11%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for VXUS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMWD.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.

Performance

XMWD.L vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMWD.L achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.25% return. Over the past 10 years, XMWD.L has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 13.11%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.76% annualized return.

XMWD.L

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 3.86%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 6M: 11.19%
• 1Y: 26.38%
• 3Y*: 20.74%
• 5Y*: 11.73%
• 10Y*: 13.11%

VXUS

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 4.68%
• YTD: 14.25%
• 6M: 16.92%
• 1Y: 32.01%
• 3Y*: 19.30%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMWD.L vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMWD.L Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C	9.90%	21.37%	18.35%	23.76%	-17.92%	22.03%	16.04%	28.32%	-9.21%	22.09%
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF	14.25%	32.35%	5.08%	15.86%	-16.08%	8.98%	10.66%	21.75%	-14.43%	27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XMWD.L and VXUS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2011	0.59

The correlation between XMWD.L and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMWD.L vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMWD.L	VXUS
Technology	28.3%	18.1%
Financial Services	15.7%	22.3%
Industrials	11.4%	16.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	8.4%
Communication Services	9.3%	4.4%
Healthcare	8.8%	7.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	5.0%
Energy	4.2%	5.2%
Basic Materials	3.3%	7.6%
Utilities	2.7%	3.2%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.6%

Return for Risk

XMWD.L vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMWD.L

XMWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
XMWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
XMWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
XMWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XMWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
XMWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

VXUS

VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 60
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMWD.L vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMWD.L	VXUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.12	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	2.90	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.39	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	2.85	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.28	11.14	+2.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMWD.L vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMWD.L and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMWD.L	VXUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.12	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.53	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.57	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.39	+0.05

Drawdowns

XMWD.L vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMWD.L drawdown since its inception was -56.59%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMWD.L and VXUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMWD.L	VXUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.59%	-35.97%	-20.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-11.27%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.55%	-13.58%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.94%	-29.44%	+3.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.04%	-35.97%	+1.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-0.99%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.96%	-8.22%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	2.88%	-0.90%

Volatility

XMWD.L vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) is 3.42%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that XMWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMWD.L	VXUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	5.60%	-2.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.13%	13.00%	-3.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.88%	15.21%	-3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	16.05%	+0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.70%	17.16%	-0.46%

XMWD.L vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMWD.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMWD.L vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

XMWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF	2.66%	3.18%	3.37%	3.24%	3.09%	3.10%	2.14%	3.06%	3.18%	2.73%	2.93%	2.83%
XMWD.L Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMWD.L and VXUS in my portfolio?

XMWD.L and VXUS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMWD.L or VXUS?

On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMWD.L or VXUS?

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XMWD.L.

What is the main difference between XMWD.L and VXUS?

XMWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XMWD.L and 0.05% for VXUS.