XMWD.L vs. IQCY.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMWD.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and IQCY.L (Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) are both Global Equities funds - XMWD.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while IQCY.L tracks the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMWD.L returned 11.74%/yr vs 47.23%/yr for IQCY.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.

Performance

XMWD.L vs. IQCY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) and Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XMWD.L is traded in USD, while IQCY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IQCY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMWD.L achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than IQCY.L's 29.87% return.

XMWD.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 4.02%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 25.86%
• 3Y*: 20.70%
• 5Y*: 11.74%
• 10Y*: 13.01%

IQCY.L

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 10.17%
• YTD: 29.87%
• 6M: 29.24%
• 1Y: 48.58%
• 3Y*: 97.15%
• 5Y*: 47.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMWD.L vs. IQCY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XMWD.L Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C	9.93%	21.37%	18.35%	23.76%	-17.92%	22.03%	32.13%
IQCY.L Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	29.87%	22.73%	335.49%	23.99%	-25.83%	16.67%	45.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XMWD.L and IQCY.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020	0.81

The correlation between XMWD.L and IQCY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMWD.L vs. IQCY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMWD.L	IQCY.L
Technology	28.3%	45.0%
Financial Services	15.7%	0.5%
Industrials	11.4%	46.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	0.7%
Communication Services	9.3%	2.7%
Healthcare	8.8%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	0.0%
Energy	4.2%	0.0%
Basic Materials	3.3%	1.4%
Utilities	2.7%	3.2%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.0%

Return for Risk

XMWD.L vs. IQCY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMWD.L

XMWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
XMWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XMWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
XMWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XMWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XMWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

IQCY.L

IQCY.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
IQCY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IQCY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
IQCY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
IQCY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IQCY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMWD.L vs. IQCY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) and Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMWD.L	IQCY.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.72	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	3.87	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.47	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	4.28	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.02	15.40	-2.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMWD.L vs. IQCY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the IQCY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMWD.L and IQCY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMWD.L	IQCY.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	2.72	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.36	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.40	+0.04

Drawdowns

XMWD.L vs. IQCY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMWD.L drawdown since its inception was -56.59%, which is greater than IQCY.L's maximum drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMWD.L and IQCY.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMWD.L	IQCY.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.59%	-33.10%	-23.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-11.31%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.55%	-20.87%	+3.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.94%	-33.10%	+7.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-1.30%	+0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.96%	-8.49%	+0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	3.14%	-1.16%

Volatility

XMWD.L vs. IQCY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) is 3.41%, while Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that XMWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQCY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMWD.L	IQCY.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.41%	6.81%	-3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.13%	13.92%	-4.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.86%	17.79%	-5.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	132.45%	-116.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.70%	120.45%	-103.75%

XMWD.L vs. IQCY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XMWD.L and IQCY.L have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

Dividends

XMWD.L vs. IQCY.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMWD.L nor IQCY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMWD.L and IQCY.L in my portfolio?

XMWD.L and IQCY.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMWD.L or IQCY.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMWD.L or IQCY.L?

XMWD.L and IQCY.L have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

What is the main difference between XMWD.L and IQCY.L?

XMWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IQCY.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi.